Efficient JSON Encoding with json.make_encoder

Efficient JSON Encoding with json.make_encoder

JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) has become the de facto standard for data exchange in state-of-the-art web applications and APIs. Its simplicity, readability, and language-independent nature make it an excellent choice for storing and transmitting structured data.

In Python, working with JSON is made easy thanks to the built-in json module. This module provides methods to encode Python objects into JSON strings and decode JSON strings back into Python objects. The process of converting Python objects to JSON is often referred to as serialization or encoding.

Let’s look at a basic example of JSON encoding in Python:

import json

# Python dictionary
data = {
    "name": "Nick Johnson",
    "age": 30,
    "city": "New York",
    "hobbies": ["reading", "swimming", "coding"]

# Encode the dictionary to JSON
json_string = json.dumps(data)


This code snippet demonstrates how to convert a Python dictionary into a JSON string using the json.dumps() function. The output will be a valid JSON string:

{"name": "Neil Hamilton", "age": 30, "city": "New York", "hobbies": ["reading", "swimming", "coding"]}

The json module can handle various Python data types, including:

  • Dictionaries
  • Lists
  • Strings
  • Numbers (integers and floats)
  • Booleans
  • None (which is converted to null in JSON)

It’s worth noting that not all Python objects can be directly serialized to JSON. For instance, complex data types like sets, tuples, or custom objects require special handling. In such cases, you may need to implement custom encoding logic or use libraries that extend JSON functionality.

When working with large datasets or in performance-critical applications, efficient JSON encoding becomes crucial. The standard json.dumps() function is suitable for most use cases, but there are situations where you might need to optimize the encoding process for better performance.

In the following sections, we’ll explore more advanced techniques for JSON encoding in Python, including the use of json.make_encoder() to create custom, efficient JSON encoders tailored to specific use cases.

Understanding JSON Serialization in Python

JSON serialization in Python involves converting Python objects into JSON-formatted strings. The built-in json module provides two primary methods for this purpose: json.dumps() for encoding to a string and json.dump() for writing directly to a file-like object.

Let’s dive deeper into the serialization process and explore some advanced features:

1. Handling Custom Objects

By default, the JSON encoder can’t handle custom Python objects. To serialize custom objects, you need to provide a custom encoder function. Here’s an example:

import json

class Person:
    def __init__(self, name, age):
        self.name = name
        self.age = age

def person_encoder(obj):
    if isinstance(obj, Person):
        return {"name": obj.name, "age": obj.age}
    raise TypeError(f"Object of type {obj.__class__.__name__} is not JSON serializable")

person = Person("Alice", 30)
json_string = json.dumps(person, default=person_encoder)

2. Controlling JSON Output Format

The json.dumps() function accepts several parameters to control the output format:

  • For pretty-printing with a specified indentation level
  • To specify separators for items and key-value pairs
  • To sort dictionary keys alphabetically


data = {"name": "John", "age": 30, "city": "New York"}
formatted_json = json.dumps(data, indent=2, sort_keys=True, separators=(',', ': '))

3. Handling Special Data Types

Some Python data types, like datetime objects, aren’t directly JSON serializable. You can use the default parameter to provide a custom encoding function:

import json
from datetime import datetime

def datetime_encoder(obj):
    if isinstance(obj, datetime):
        return obj.isoformat()
    raise TypeError(f"Object of type {obj.__class__.__name__} is not JSON serializable")

data = {"timestamp": datetime.now()}
json_string = json.dumps(data, default=datetime_encoder)

4. Using JSONEncoder Subclass

For more complex serialization logic, you can subclass json.JSONEncoder:

import json
from datetime import datetime

class CustomEncoder(json.JSONEncoder):
    def default(self, obj):
        if isinstance(obj, datetime):
            return obj.isoformat()
        return super().default(obj)

data = {"timestamp": datetime.now()}
json_string = json.dumps(data, cls=CustomEncoder)

5. Handling Circular References

Circular references can cause issues during serialization. One way to handle that is by implementing a custom encoder that keeps track of objects:

import json

class CircularRefEncoder(json.JSONEncoder):
    def default(self, obj):
        if hasattr(obj, '__dict__'):
            return {key: value for key, value in obj.__dict__.items()
                    if key != '__parent__'}
        return super().default(obj)

class Node:
    def __init__(self, name):
        self.name = name
        self.children = []

root = Node("root")
child1 = Node("child1")
child2 = Node("child2")
root.children = [child1, child2]
child1.__parent__ = root
child2.__parent__ = root

json_string = json.dumps(root, cls=CircularRefEncoder, indent=2)

Understanding these advanced serialization techniques allows you to handle complex data structures and customize the JSON output according to your specific needs. In the next section, we’ll explore how to improve performance using json.make_encoder().

Improving Performance with json.make_encoder

The json.make_encoder() function is a powerful tool for creating custom JSON encoders that can significantly improve encoding performance for specific use cases. It allows you to create a specialized encoder function tailored to your data structure, potentially reducing overhead and increasing speed.

Here’s how you can use json.make_encoder() to create a custom encoder:

import json

# Define a custom encoding function
def encode_person(obj):
    if isinstance(obj, Person):
        return {"name": obj.name, "age": obj.age}
    raise TypeError(f"Object of type {obj.__class__.__name__} is not JSON serializable")

# Create a custom encoder using json.make_encoder()
custom_encoder = json.make_encoder(default=encode_person)

# Use the custom encoder
person = Person("Alice", 30)
json_string = custom_encoder(person)

The json.make_encoder() function accepts the same parameters as json.dumps(), which will allow you to fine-tune the encoding process. Here are some key benefits of using json.make_encoder():

  • By creating a specialized encoder, you can avoid the overhead of repeatedly checking for custom object types in large datasets.
  • Once created, the custom encoder can be reused multiple times without recreating the encoder function for each encoding operation.
  • You can tailor the encoder to your specific data structures, potentially optimizing the encoding process further.

Let’s look at a more complex example where we use json.make_encoder() to create an efficient encoder for a specific data structure:

import json
from datetime import datetime

class Event:
    def __init__(self, name, date, attendees):
        self.name = name
        self.date = date
        self.attendees = attendees

def encode_event(obj):
    if isinstance(obj, Event):
        return {
            "name": obj.name,
            "date": obj.date.isoformat(),
            "attendees": obj.attendees
    elif isinstance(obj, datetime):
        return obj.isoformat()
    raise TypeError(f"Object of type {obj.__class__.__name__} is not JSON serializable")

# Create a custom encoder
event_encoder = json.make_encoder(
    separators=(',', ':'),  # Compact JSON output
    sort_keys=True  # Consistent ordering of keys

# Sample data
events = [
    Event("Conference", datetime(2023, 6, 15), ["Alice", "Bob", "Charlie"]),
    Event("Workshop", datetime(2023, 7, 1), ["David", "Eve"])

# Encode the data using the custom encoder
json_string = event_encoder(events)

In this example, we’ve created a custom encoder that efficiently handles Event objects and datetime objects. The resulting encoder is optimized for this specific data structure and can be reused for multiple encoding operations.

To further improve performance when working with large datasets, you can combine json.make_encoder() with other optimization techniques:

  • For internal data storage or transmission, think using binary formats like MessagePack or Protocol Buffers, which can be faster and more compact than JSON.
  • If you’re repeatedly encoding similar objects, implement a caching mechanism to store and reuse encoded results.
  • When dealing with large datasets, process and encode data in batches to reduce memory usage and improve overall performance.

By using json.make_encoder() and applying these optimization techniques, you can significantly improve the performance of JSON encoding in your Python applications, especially when working with complex data structures or large datasets.

Tips for Efficient JSON Encoding

When working with JSON encoding in Python, there are several tips and best practices you can follow to ensure efficient and optimized performance. Here are some key strategies to consider:

  1. Use simpler data structures

    Whenever possible, use simple data structures that are easily serializable to JSON. Stick to dictionaries, lists, strings, numbers, and booleans. Avoid complex nested structures or custom objects when not necessary. For example:

    # Prefer this
    simple_data = {
        "name": "Neil Hamilton",
        "age": 30,
        "skills": ["Python", "JSON", "Web Development"]
    # Instead of this
    class Person:
        def __init__(self, name, age, skills):
            self.name = name
            self.age = age
            self.skills = skills
    complex_data = Person("Vatslav Kowalsky", 30, ["Python", "JSON", "Web Development"])
  2. Use built-in data types

    Python’s built-in data types are optimized for performance. When possible, use them instead of custom classes. For instance, use a dictionary instead of a custom object:

    # Prefer this
    user = {
        "id": 1,
        "username": "johndoe",
        "email": "[email protected]"
    # Instead of this
    class User:
        def __init__(self, id, username, email):
            self.id = id
            self.username = username
            self.email = email
    user = User(1, "johndoe", "[email protected]")
  3. Minimize data

    Only include necessary data in your JSON output. Remove any redundant or unnecessary fields to reduce the size of the JSON payload:

    # Full data
    full_data = {
        "id": 1,
        "username": "johndoe",
        "email": "[email protected]",
        "created_at": "2023-05-01T12:00:00Z",
        "last_login": "2023-05-15T09:30:00Z",
        "is_active": True,
        "profile_picture": "https://example.com/johndoe.jpg"
    # Minimized data
    minimized_data = {
        "id": full_data["id"],
        "username": full_data["username"],
        "email": full_data["email"]
    json_string = json.dumps(minimized_data)
  4. Use compact encoding

    When size is a concern, use compact encoding by specifying separators:

    compact_json = json.dumps(data, separators=(',', ':'))
  5. Avoid repeated encoding

    If you need to encode the same data multiple times, consider caching the result:

    import functools
    def cached_json_dumps(obj):
        return json.dumps(obj)
    # Use the cached function for repeated encoding
    json_string = cached_json_dumps(data)
  6. Use specialized libraries for specific use cases

    For certain types of data or specific performance requirements, ponder using specialized libraries:

    • A fast JSON encoder and decoder written in C with Python bindings.
    • A simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder and decoder.
    • A fast JSON parser/generator for C++ with Python bindings.
    import ujson
    json_string = ujson.dumps(data)
  7. Implement custom encoding for complex objects

    For complex objects that cannot be directly serialized, implement a custom encoding method:

    class ComplexObject:
        def __init__(self, x, y):
            self.x = x
            self.y = y
        def to_json(self):
            return {"x": self.x, "y": self.y}
    def complex_encoder(obj):
        if hasattr(obj, 'to_json'):
            return obj.to_json()
        raise TypeError(f"Object of type {obj.__class__.__name__} is not JSON serializable")
    data = {"object": ComplexObject(1, 2)}
    json_string = json.dumps(data, default=complex_encoder)
  8. Use streaming for large datasets

    When dealing with large datasets, think using streaming to reduce memory usage:

    def generate_large_dataset():
        for i in range(1000000):
            yield {"id": i, "value": f"item_{i}"}
    with open('large_data.json', 'w') as f:
        for i, item in enumerate(generate_large_dataset()):
            if i > 0:
            json.dump(item, f)

By following these tips and best practices, you can significantly improve the efficiency of JSON encoding in your Python applications, resulting in faster processing times and reduced resource usage.

Benchmarking JSON Encoding Techniques

To benchmark JSON encoding techniques, we can compare different methods and libraries for encoding JSON data. This process helps us understand the performance characteristics of various approaches and make informed decisions about which technique to use in our applications. Let’s explore some benchmarking strategies and compare different JSON encoding methods.

First, let’s set up a benchmarking function that measures the execution time of different encoding techniques:

import time
import json
import ujson
import simplejson
import rapidjson

def benchmark(func, data, iterations=1000):
    start_time = time.time()
    for _ in range(iterations):
    end_time = time.time()
    return (end_time - start_time) / iterations

# Sample data for benchmarking
sample_data = {
    "id": 12345,
    "name": "Luke Douglas",
    "age": 30,
    "email": "[email protected]",
    "is_active": True,
    "tags": ["python", "json", "benchmarking"],
    "address": {
        "street": "123 Main St",
        "city": "Anytown",
        "country": "USA"

Now, let’s compare the performance of different JSON encoding methods:

# Standard json module
print("json.dumps():", benchmark(json.dumps, sample_data))

# json.make_encoder()
custom_encoder = json.make_encoder()
print("json.make_encoder():", benchmark(custom_encoder, sample_data))

# ujson
print("ujson.dumps():", benchmark(ujson.dumps, sample_data))

# simplejson
print("simplejson.dumps():", benchmark(simplejson.dumps, sample_data))

# rapidjson
print("rapidjson.dumps():", benchmark(rapidjson.dumps, sample_data))

# Compact encoding with json module
print("json.dumps() (compact):", benchmark(lambda x: json.dumps(x, separators=(',', ':')), sample_data))

This benchmark compares the standard json module, json.make_encoder(), and third-party libraries like ujson, simplejson, and rapidjson. It also includes a compact encoding option using the standard json module.

To get more comprehensive results, we can benchmark with different data sizes and complexities:

import random

def generate_complex_data(size):
    data = []
    for _ in range(size):
        item = {
            "id": random.randint(1, 1000000),
            "name": f"User_{random.randint(1, 10000)}",
            "age": random.randint(18, 80),
            "email": f"user{random.randint(1, 10000)}@example.com",
            "is_active": random.choice([True, False]),
            "tags": random.sample(["python", "json", "benchmarking", "performance", "encoding"], k=3),
            "score": round(random.uniform(0, 100), 2),
            "address": {
                "street": f"{random.randint(1, 999)} {random.choice(['Main', 'Oak', 'Pine', 'Maple'])} St",
                "city": random.choice(["New York", "Los Angeles", "Chicago", "Houston", "Phoenix"]),
                "country": "USA"
    return data

# Benchmark with different data sizes
for size in [100, 1000, 10000]:
    print(f"nBenchmarking with {size} items:")
    complex_data = generate_complex_data(size)
    print("json.dumps():", benchmark(json.dumps, complex_data, iterations=100))
    print("json.make_encoder():", benchmark(custom_encoder, complex_data, iterations=100))
    print("ujson.dumps():", benchmark(ujson.dumps, complex_data, iterations=100))
    print("simplejson.dumps():", benchmark(simplejson.dumps, complex_data, iterations=100))
    print("rapidjson.dumps():", benchmark(rapidjson.dumps, complex_data, iterations=100))
    print("json.dumps() (compact):", benchmark(lambda x: json.dumps(x, separators=(',', ':')), complex_data, iterations=100))

This extended benchmark tests the encoding methods with datasets of varying sizes, giving us insights into how each method performs as the data complexity increases.

When interpreting the results, consider the following factors:

  • Lower execution times indicate better performance.
  • Look for methods that maintain good performance across different data sizes.
  • Some methods might be faster but may have limitations in terms of features or compatibility.

Remember that benchmark results can vary depending on the specific hardware, Python version, and library versions used. It is always a good idea to run benchmarks on your target environment with data that closely resembles your actual use case.

Based on the benchmark results, you can make informed decisions about which JSON encoding technique to use in your application. For example:

  • If raw speed is the top priority and you don’t need advanced features, ujson or rapidjson might be the best choice.
  • If you need a balance between speed and features, the standard json module with compact encoding or json.make_encoder() could be suitable.
  • For complex use cases that require extensive customization, sticking with the standard json module or simplejson might be preferable despite potentially slower performance.

By regularly benchmarking your JSON encoding processes, you can ensure that your application maintains optimal performance as your data and requirements evolve over time.

Conclusion and Future Considerations

As we conclude our exploration of efficient JSON encoding in Python, it’s important to reflect on the key takeaways and think future developments in this area.

The json.make_encoder() function has proven to be a powerful tool for creating custom, efficient JSON encoders tailored to specific use cases. By using this function, developers can significantly improve encoding performance, especially when dealing with large datasets or complex data structures.

Some key points to remember:

  • Custom encoders created with json.make_encoder() can be reused, reducing overhead in repetitive encoding tasks.
  • Tailoring encoders to specific data structures can lead to substantial performance gains.
  • Combining json.make_encoder() with other optimization techniques, such as caching and batch processing, can further enhance performance.

Looking ahead, we can anticipate several developments in the field of JSON encoding:

  • As JSON remains an important data format, we can expect ongoing improvements in the performance of JSON libraries, both in the standard library and third-party packages.
  • Future versions of Python may introduce new features or optimizations that could be leveraged for more efficient JSON encoding.
  • As hardware continues to evolve, we may see new opportunities for hardware-accelerated JSON encoding, particularly for large-scale applications.

For developers working with JSON in Python, it’s crucial to stay informed about these developments and continuously reassess your encoding strategies. Regular benchmarking and profiling of your JSON operations can help identify opportunities for optimization as new tools and techniques become available.

Remember that while performance is important, it should be balanced with other factors such as code readability, maintainability, and compatibility with your broader application architecture. The most efficient solution is not always the best fit for every situation.

As you continue to work with JSON in Python, ponder exploring advanced topics such as:

  • Asynchronous JSON encoding for high-concurrency applications
  • Streaming JSON encoding for handling extremely large datasets
  • Integration of JSON encoding with other serialization formats for hybrid data processing pipelines

By staying curious and open to new approaches, you can ensure that your JSON encoding practices remain efficient and effective as your applications evolve and grow.


No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *